Wednesday, December 4, 2019
The American Revolution
Question: Choose a topic from the list below; no exceptions. Your topic must be different from your primary source analysis paper. Who fought in the American Revolution? (militia and/or Continental army) 1. Prospectus: This is the proposal for your review essay. It will contain two parts: a) working bibliography, b) short-list. Your prospectus should be approximately 2 pages in length. a. Working Bibliography Once you have selected your topic, the next step is to find as many relevant sources as you can and create a working bibliography, or a list of potential secondary sources that you might use in your review essay. Think of historiography as conversations among historians. In order to understand what has been said you need to listen widely. This list can include academic monographs (books by a single author), essays from edited collections, and journal articles. You may NOT use web essays or blogs, book reviews, or encyclopedia entries like Wikipedia. However, these sources can sometimes he lp you find secondary sources through references. A better place to look for sources is in the notes of a relevant source or library database such as America: History Life. Works should be listed alphabetically by authors last name using Chicago manual of style-humanities format. Databases like America: History Life will generate accurate citations for articles but not books. Your list should include at least 10 works including books (monographs and/or essay collections) and journal articles. If you are focusing on recent work, this list still may include studies published before 2000. You may also include published historiography reviews either in collected volumes or journals. b. Short-List Next create a short-list of three (3) scholarly works you will review. One of your sources may come from course readings. Youre encouraged to consult but may not count published historiographical reviews that take stock of what historians have written about the Revolution broadly or on a spec ific topic such as women among the 3 required sources. Each source must contribute an original argument/new interpretation. How do you decide? Your final decision should be determined by your approach (#1 or #2) as well as the comparative potential of particular works. For example, you may select works that offer opposing arguments (scholarly debate) or historians who approach the same historical problem through contrasting methods. If you want to discuss change over time (#2), then select a range of works being sure to include both past (pre-1990) and recent work (post-2000). Focus on a particular theme or debate (e.g., Loyalists African American diaspora, Women new approaches to elite women). Use titles and library catalog/database subject headings to identify key terms/sub-topics. The short-list will take the form of a paragraph that identifies: Answer: Working Bibliography: Andrews, Charles M. The Colonial Background of the American Revolution Place - New Haven, Connecticut. Year of publishing - 1931 Alden, John R. History of the American Revolution Place- New York: Knopf. Year of publishing - 1969 Barnes, Ian - The Historical Atlas of the American Revolution. Place- New York: Routledge. Year of publishing -2000 R.I. - The American Revolution, 17751783: An Encyclopedia, two volumes. Place - New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. Year of publishing - 1993 Boatner, III, Mark M. The Encyclopedia of the American Revolution. Place- New York: David McKay Co. Year of publishing - 1994, 1966 Conway, Stephen The War of American Independence. London: Edward Arnold Year of publishing - 1995 Don Higginbothams The War of American Independence: Military Attitudes, Polices, And Practice Year of Publishing 1998. Place America. Fiske, John The American Revolution. 2 volumes. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company. Year of publishing - 1901 George Washington's - Military Genius Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc. Year of publishing - 2012. Heale, M. J. The American Revolution. Place - London: Methuen. Year of publishing - 1986 Hibbert, Christopher Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolution through British Eyes. Place - New York: Norton. Year of publishing - 1990 Sylvia R. Freys, The British Soldier in America: A Social History of Military Life in the Revolution Period Short-List As we discuss about more about the topic of American Revolution we would have an in depth analysis of whether the revolution was fought by the militia or the continental army. In order to debate over the subject let us talk more about the work of Andrews Charles M in the colonial background of the American Revolution. The work of the Andrews are 4 essays which revolve around the background of the American Revolution. It states the causes and conditions that ultimately led to the American Revolution. The author argues that the colonies of North America (British Colonies) were actually set up to generate profit. They produced goods that could be exported. These and few other differences led to a fight between parliament and colonies. The difference of the thought process ultimately led to a war. In his study The War of American Independence: Military Attitudes, Polices, And Practice Don Higginbothams has correctly and accurately explained the military policies that existed during the Americas crucial period and its ultimate impact on the life of a common American as well as soldiers. The author also explains the difference between the different types of soldiers. One who would fight every time their family was in danger, and the other who would fight only when they were commenced to fight for. The author also explains the difference the thinking of these soldiers. It should be noted that these militia were volunteers. If we look into the work of Frey The British Soldier in America, the author clearly states the mental conditions of the soldier at the crucial war time in America. The work states the challenges faced by them during the war.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.